Join merriemarie on Amplify
The Web's Social News Network.

Curate, connect & build relationships you'll learn from.

merriemarie's clog

About this Amplog

Iranian Protesters to Obama: “You’re Either With Us or With Them”

"I have made it clear that the United States of America wants to move beyond this past, and seeks a relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran based upon mutual interests and mutual respect."

Now the Iranian protesters know who the man is with.


Since we've never had a President who favored tyranny over liberty before, this appears to be unchar... read more

Amplifyd from directorblue.blogspot.com
ABC reports: Iranian protesters took to the streets today as they do every Nov. 4 to mark the 30th anniversary of the U.S. embassy takeover. But this year, opponents of the Iranian regime used the government sanctioned day of street demonstrations to challenge the hard line administration. While supporters of the regime led chants of “death to America,” crowds nearby shouted “death to the dictator,” a veiled reference to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his political ally, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
And via this video report, CNN adds the protestors had a direct message for America’s president too: “You’re Either With Us or With Them”
Meanwhile, somewhere on another planet, a pointy-eared man with a peculiar name had this to say about the takeover by Iranian militants of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran: “This event helped set the United States and Iran on a path of sustained suspicion, mistrust and confrontation,” he said in his statement. Read more at directorblue.blogspot.com
 

Ahmadinejad Speaks to Empty Room

Delegates Walk Out On Ahmadinejad

Amplifyd from news.sky.com

Breaking News

3:11am UK, Thursday September 24, 2009

British delegates joined a series of other nations in staging a walk-out in protest at remarks made by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in a speech to the UN.

Canadian delegates left the room before Mr Ahmadinejad had even begun to speak

Delegates walk out as Ahmadinejad prepares to speak at the UN General Assembly

In his address, Mr Ahmadinejad launched a scathing attack on Israel, a frequent target of his fury, accusing it of adopting “inhuman policies” in the Palestinian territories.

He claimed greater global freedom and the “awakening of nations” would force Israel to abandon its “hypocrisy and vicious attitudes”.

British delegates joined American and French representatives in leaving the room at the UN headquarters at this point.

A spokeswoman for the UK delegation said the walk-out was prompted by “anti-Semitic” rhetoric.

Ahmadienjad’s presence was met with protests outside the UN headquarters

Protesters opposed to President Ahmadinejad demonstrate outside the UN HQ in New York

He lashed out at capitalism, arguing it had reached the end of the road and would suffer the same fate as Marxism.

Read more at news.sky.com
 

Undeterred, Mr Ahmadinejad went on to accuse foreign troops of spreading “war, bloodshed, aggression, terror and intimidation” in Iraq and Afghanistan.

And he also used his speech to brush off accusations that his re-election in June was a fraud, describing the polling day as “glorious and fully democratic”.

Notably absent from Mr Ahmadinejad’s podium address was the subject of Tehran’s stand-off with Western powers over its nuclear ambitions.

As the Iranian leader prepared to address delegates, the UN Security Council members announced that they were expecting Iran to engage with them on the issue.

“We expect a serious response from Iran and will decide, in the context of our dual track approach, as a result of the meeting, on our next steps,” Foreign Secretary David Miliband said on behalf of Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States.

Realtime results for #GreenNY


http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23GreenNY

“It’s Life Has Come To An End” Ahmadinejad Lays The Smack Talk On Israel

Amplifyd from patdollard.com
a-jad-smirk

“The pretext (Holocaust) for the creation of the Zionist regime (Israel) is false … It is a lie based on an unprovable and mythical claim,” he told worshippers at Tehran University at the end of an annual anti-Israel “Qods (Jerusalem) Day” rally.

“Confronting the Zionist regime is a national and religious duty.”

“This regime (Israel) will not last long. Do not tie your fate to it … This regime has no future. Its life has come to an end,” he said in a speech broadcast live on state radio.

Britain was swift in condemning Ahmadinejad’s remarks, calling them “abhorrent as well as ignorant”.

Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, leader of Lebanon’s Iran-backed Hezbollah which fought a 34-day war with Israel in 2006, defended Ahmadinejad and said he was criticised for supporting “the ‘resistance’, the people of the region and Palestine.”

“Our belief and creed … remain that Israel is an illegal entity, a cancerous tumour, that must cease to exist,” he said in a televised address.

Read more at patdollard.com
 

Ahmadinejad’s fresh comments came ahead of his appearance at the United Nations General Assembly next week and before Tehran attends talks on Oct. 1 with major powers worried about the Islamic Republic’s nuclear strategy.

NUCLEAR PROGRAMME

Ahmadinejad repeated on Thursday that Iran would “never” abandon its disputed nuclear programme to appease critics.

In an NBC-TV interview, he also offered no direct response when asked whether there were any conditions under which Iran would develop a nuclear weapon.

“We don’t need nuclear weapons,” Ahmadinejad said, speaking through an interpreter. “We do not see any need for such weapons. And the conditions around the world are moving to favour our ideas,” he added.

President Barack Obama, who came to office pledging to engage with Iran, has suggested Tehran may face harsher sanctions, possibly targeting its gasoline imports, if it does not accept good-faith talks by the end of September.

But Russia, which has veto power in the U.N. Security Council, last week ruled out oil sanctions against Iran.

Iran, the world’s fifth-biggest crude producer, is seen as vulnerable to oil sanctions because it imports 40 percent of its gasoline to supply the cheap fuel Iranians see as a birthright.

TURMOIL AT HOME

On Friday, Iranian security forces clashed with supporters of opposition leader Mirhossein Mousavi and arrested at least 10 of them during annual anti-Israel rallies in Tehran.

Thousands of supporters of Mousavi, wearing green wristbands or shawls, were among crowds marching in the “Qods Day” rallies.

The state news agency IRNA said Mousavi and reformist cleric Mehdi Karoubi, both defeated candidates in June, had been forced to leave the rallies after being attacked by “angry people”.

Reformist former president Mohammad Khatami took part in the rally, but was attacked by hardliners and had to leave after his robe was ripped and his turban fell to the ground, an ally of Khatami who accompanied him told Reuters.

The opposition says 70 people died during protests after the vote. It contradicts the official death toll of 36 people.

Calls Holocaust “Mythical”  Read more >>>

A Profoundly Dangerous Message

Amplifyd from www.independent.co.uk

On 12 June, many Iranians voted for the first time because they believed there was a real chance to get rid of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a man whose every utterance leaves them feeling humiliated. But a great many of the millions who came out on to the streets in the aftermath of the stolen election weren’t just releasing their outrage at Ahmadinejad or his plain-clothes thugs. They were expressing a message far more dangerous to the mullahs: the Islamic Republic does not legitimately represent the Iranian Nation.

From morning to night, we are told that while the Islamic Republic is well on its way to delivering divine virtues, the rest of the world is in a state of moral and economic collapse.
But even if they won’t admit it, our rulers must be worried. They know that after last month’s unrest and the violent suppression that followed, the nation is still in deep crisis. And they also know that something profound has changed.Read more at www.independent.co.uk
 

Because never at any time since the revolution has public criticism been as open and as bitter as now.

The state television channel as the mouthpiece of the regime is increasingly mocked for its lies. We watched in disbelief as it broadcast cookery shows during the upheaval. Now we view staged confessions by some of the countless individuals rounded up after the election.


A colleague quietly left a piece of paper on my desk tallying recent news items on IRIB. Neda Agha Soltan, the young woman shot dead during a street protest, was mentioned three times; Uighur Muslims in China eight times and the killing of an Egyptian-born Muslim woman by a racist in Germany 140 times.


Until recently, it was almost unheard of to utter criticism and the name of the Supreme Leader in the same breath. But now, even Ayatollah Ali Khamenei does not escape, and I don’t mean just in conversations between trusted friends. My own father, seriously mistrustful of talking about anything meaningful on the telephone, has given up observing his own cautious rules after almost three decades.


The people who are now daring to speak out like my father are not all intellectuals from north Tehran. Nor are they organised resistance. They are fed up with their salaries being eaten by inflation, or that their university-educated children have no prospect of a job. And they seethe at the unimaginable gap between them and loyal members of the Revolutionary Guard who have recently enjoyed salary rises.


An unusually thick smog covered up the rarely blue sky of Tehran the other day, prompting a friend to remark: “God cursed this country.”


The smog has lifted. But the lifeless body of Sohrab Arabi, a 19-year-old student activist, was finally buried by his heartbroken mother in Beheshte-Zahara cemetery this week. He disappeared on 15 June and was missing for weeks. Now he is interred in the graveyard where thousands with the same hope as him – democracy – were buried 30 years ago.


Those mourning Neda will commemorate her again on the 40th day since her death, unless that event too is crushed. If there is a good ending to this script, these deaths will have achieved something. If not, perhaps God really did curse Iran.


The author’s name has been changed

Ahmadinejad Threatens Obama

Amplifyd from www.danielpipes.org
Nearly lost in the exchange of invective between Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Barack Obama is the former warning to put the latter on trial. Thomas Erdbrink and William Branigin offer details at “Iran’s President Rebukes Obama; Candidates Reject Election Review” in the Washington Post today

First, the setting: on June 26, Obama

praised protesters for showing “bravery in the face of brutality,” described violence against them as “outrageous” and said opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi has “captured the imagination” of Iranians who want a more open society. Obama also dismissed Ahmadinejad’s demand for an apology for previous criticism and suggested that the Iranian leader apologize to the families of those who have been arrested, beaten or killed in the crackdown.

The reply came a day later:

Noting that Obama has spoken of “reforms and changes,” Ahmadinejad asked, “Why did he interfere and comment in a way that disregards convention and courtesy?”Read more at www.danielpipes.org
 

He said Western leaders who made “insulting and irrelevant comments will be put on a fair trial” by Iran at international gatherings. …

Ahmadinejad also vowed to take a tougher approach toward alleged meddling by the West during his second four-year term, which the government has said will begin this summer. “Without a doubt, Iran’s new government will have a more decisive and firmer approach toward the West,” Ahmadinejad said. “This time the Iranian nation’s reply will be harsh and more decisive,” to make the West regret its “meddlesome stance,” he said.

Comments: (1) This over-the-top bellicosity reminds me why I originally endorsed Ahmadinejad to win the June 12 elections and serve another four years as president of Iran. His aggressive comments might even awake an Obama to the inutility of nice words and gestures toward Tehran.

(2) The Islamic Republic of Iran will put the U.S. president on trial? Shades of Bertrand Russell’s kangaroo “International War Crimes Tribunal.” It should provide quite a spectacle. (June 28, 2009)

Victorious President Ahmadinejad Showers Obama with Insults

Amplifyd from www.julescrittenden.com

Good News For Obama!

And his anti-nuke foreign policy plans!
NYT reports despair in Tehran as the anti-regime protests that threatened Obama’s peace plans sputter out, thanks to violence, arrests, tortured confessions and the threat of executions.
Former Spanish PM Aznar at WSJ: silence, inaction have consequences. You remember Aznar. He believed in facing down evil

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before. via Gateway: Iran detains embassy personnel.

Here’s some O admin logic, via Doyle McManus at the LA Times:

… a top Obama foreign policy advisor told me the president still wants negotiations as soon as possible. “We do not believe that talking is a reward for good behavior, or that not talking is a good punishment for bad behavior,” he said

McManus adds:

Of course, Obama should never mute U.S. condemnation of internal repression in Iran or U.S. support for human rights as a price for nuclear talks — and he will not, aides say.

Too late, he already did! Read more at www.julescrittenden.com
 

Though going forward the Iranians undoubtedly can expect to find themselves on the receiving end of some stern, carefully parsed lip pro-democracy service.

Indeed, the trick will be maintaining clear moral support for Iran’s democrats — plus any other aid that’s useful, including keeping Iranians’ lines of communication open, from Western broadcasts to cellphones to Twitter — in the face of Iranian negotiators’ inevitable complaints.

But in skillful hands, negotiations need not strengthen a dying regime. Instead, if the mullahs can be talked into abandoning some of the ideological pillars that have sustained their revolution for three decades, negotiations could undermine their rule in the long run.

And that’s not a new challenge for American diplomacy. Twenty years ago, Ronald Reagan sought nuclear arms deals with Moscow even as he denounced the Soviet Union as “an evil empire.” Reagan aimed to undermine Soviet communism, but he also negotiated with its leaders — and he succeeded at both.

I’ve heard that Reagan-Soviet Union thing a few times in recent weeks. Very popular with the lefties. But the analogy overlooks some key facts. Reagan believed the American way is better and was its active proponent in the world. Obama doesn’t, and isn’t. Reagan also believed that building up U.S. forces and actively supporting the forces of freedom around the world was key. Obama doesn’t. Obama believes America needs to apologize for promoting its values, defending freedom and combating terrorism in the world, and wants to disengage as quickly as possible.

Ahmadinejad Breaks His Silence

Amplifyd from www.youtube.com
You have to wonder if Ahmadinejad has checked out Twitter, and if he went through the whole “what the hell do I need with a site that lets me tell the world what I had for lunch” sorta thing we all went through. …Ha-ha. What a dick.
Read more at www.youtube.com
 

It turns out, in Farsi “Twitter” means “ex-dictator.”

I-Report Leaks Ahmadinejad Requesting Council Implement “Pure Islamic State”

Amplifyd from mypetjawa.mu.nu

Via CNN’s I-Report:

June 23, 2009

IF YOU CANNOT SPEAK PERSIAN, PLEASE TWITTER AND RESEND THIS TO OTHERS THIS NEEDS TO BE SEEN BY THE WHOLE WORLD

DISCLAIMER:this video was sent to me from Iran which has video proof of ahmadinejad proposing to change the islamic republic system in IRan at the moment to chane it to a dictatorship where people do not have the right to vote. The Voter Fraud of June 12 is a direct result of this proposition. PLEASE RT

PLEASE USE YOUR FARSI TRANSLATORS TO VERIFY THIS.

I became aware of the vid after Allahpundit posted a request for a translattion via twitter. I then emailed several of Jawa’s helpers asking for a translation. I have a summary translation below the fold and also here at Sevenload. It appears to me the video was taken shortly after Ahmadinejad’s was elected to his first term of office. I did not see any gray in his beard.

Update: Allahpundit has his take on this here at Hot Air.

Read more at mypetjawa.mu.nu
 

It’s impossible to tell if this is Dinnerjacket’s standard nutty boilerplate about the Islamic paradise eventually conquering the world or if he’s talking about a more specific “plan” for hardliners to assert themselves in Iran….

Update II: The video was also uploaded to Youtube in two parts five days ago.

Update III: Jawa Reader Garduneh Mehr is also able to understand the video. Here’s his take on it (below the fold).

4. Throughout he makes intentionally ambiguous references to their “Goals and fondest wishes”. [This can only mean one of two things: (a) the subjugation of the planet under the mullahs (b) the coming of their Shiah Messiah "Qa'im" whom they think will conquer the world.]
5. He says: “Fighting corruption and meting out justice is the source of much joy; but the greater joy is when our Primary Goal is achieved.

7. “Revolution has found its own way and a new phase has begun.”
8. “A difficult period has ended; yet an even more difficult period has begun.”
9. He says that he hopes that “this more difficult period will result in that very thing for which we are all anxiously waiting. [This could only mean the coming of their Shiah Messiah. In other words, he sees his plans, his actions, and his goals as being directed solely towards hastening the coming of "Qa'im".]

13. “This movement needs strong support and strong leadership.” [Probably talking about himself.]
14. “The first and best place and time to provide this support is right here in our mutual understanding.. amongst those who have devoted and continue to devote their lives to the materialization of the Islamic rule.”
15. “The conditions are perfect; and I for my part ask for your assistance while being your servant as one who was not originally part of this movement. This movement is a gift from Allah.”
16. “This movement”, he continues “is hopefully the ignition point of great global changes.” [At this point there's no doubt in my mind that he is talking about bringing about a global upheaval, perhaps with WMD's, for the purpose of hastening the coming of their Qa'im.]
17. He says that he sees himself as having been given the responsibility

This is a summary transcript of the conversation that took place between Ahmadinejad and Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi and others in Qom immediately after the elections (23/3/88 Persian calendar).

More at THE JAWA REPORT

http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/197977.php



———————————————————————————

Garduneh Mehr : Yes I can understand it completely. I’m itemizing the main points below.

Iran’s Hidden Revolution

Amplifyd from www.irantracker.org
The seeds of this coup were planted four years ago with the election of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. And while he has since disappointed his public, failing to deliver on promised economic and political reforms, his allies now control the country.
This creeping militarization has not been restricted to the central government: provincial governors, press commissars, film directors, intelligence officers and business leaders are increasingly former members of the guard. The elite force controls much of the economy either directly — the Basij has rights to oil extraction —
Technically, the pinnacle of power in Iran remains Ayatollah Khamenei, along with the 12-member Guardian Council. Yet he has proved eager to fall in with the president’s overthrow of the clerics.
Why would he deliberately undercut his own clerical class? Survival.
The unusually speedy certification of the election and Ayatollah Khamenei’s quick blessing — “a divine miracle” — only served to underscore an obvious sham.Read more at www.irantracker.org
 

Far from fretting about an impending attack from Israel or America, guard leaders have been warning the ayatollah that the most formidable threat to the Islamic Republic is a “soft regime change policy” involving the use of “orange revolutions” (as the hard-line Iranian newspaper Kayhan recently editorialized)

Encircled by American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, besieged from within by disgruntled citizens, the supreme leader has turned to a bellicose strongman to preserve the system that elevated him. Indeed, Ayatollah Khamenei — who was scorned as a religious lightweight by many more established mullahs when he was chosen for the top post in 1989 — has repeatedly shown himself willing to undercut the “Islamic” in Islamic revolution. In doing so, he has painted himself into a corner — a permanent alliance with Mr. Ahmadinejad and the Revolutionary Guards. And this fraudulent election will only push them closer together.

Yet you don’t have to be paranoid to wonder if events were following a script: protesters pour into the streets only to be beaten down by Revolutionary Guard and Basij gunmen; the regime is prepared to detain dissidents — reportedly using Facebook and Twitter to locate them; Mr. Ahmadinejad is so unworried he jets off to Russia; and every element of the confrontation has provided a pretext for an overwhelming assertion of domestic power by the Revolutionary Guards.

Some will argue that Mr. Ahmadinejad may be in a conciliatory mood because he needs talks with the United States to underscore his own legitimacy, but that can only be read as a self-serving Washington perspective. Meanwhile, the Iranian people will have suffered the consolidation of power by a ruthless regime and the transformation of a theocracy to an ideological military dictatorship. That Iran neither needs nor wants accommodation with the West.



Danielle Pletka is the vice president for foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute. Ali Alfoneh is a visiting fellow at the institute.